The Fintech Index
20 companies rated 5 sectors 1 data report Last checked Sep 23, 2026
KYC / KYC, AML & identity

Alloy

An orchestration platform for identity and fraud. It serves banks and fintechs and reaches 270+ data providers via one integration and automates decisions on fraud, credit, AML and onboarding. Privately held. Head office in New York.

Established
2015
Company type
Private
Official site
www.alloy.com

Assessment

Alloy lies between financial institutions and their data vendors. Staff reach 270+ third-party solutions that run from credit bureaus to checks on documents and devices, and build policies for fraud, onboarding, credit and AML in a visual editor. The testing suite is notable: backtesting against historical data, shadow testing, versioned rollbacks and champion-challenger tests capped at five versions.

Compliance is handled in that same place, including sanctions screening, perpetual monitoring, KYC and KYB, case management for AML, and SAR filing with FinCEN inside the product. Costs are more difficult to assess: Alloy publishes no prices, while the latest funding it announced dates from 2022. A large share of the data underneath comes from partners, and coverage follows which vendors each customer switches on.

Scenarios

ScenarioSuitabilityWhy
Coordinating several identity vendorsWell suitedOne decision engine and one integration cover 270+ data solutions.
Testing changes to policy before launchWell suitedBacktesting, shadow and champion-challenger modes are included.
SAR filing and AML case workWell suitedDirect e-filing with FinCEN and case queues.
Low-volume single ID checkNot suitedThe platform is meant for institutions that run many checks and vendors.

Built for

Credit unions, banks and fintechs that combine several credit, identity and fraud data providers and want a single place to build and to test decisions.

Less suited to

Buyers who seek published pricing, or small companies that need one low-cost ID check.

Who should consider it

Likely to suit

  • Credit unions and banks that modernize onboarding
  • Sponsor banks and fintechs that manage several vendors of data
  • Risk teams that want safe tests of rule changes

Unlikely to suit

  • Early-stage startups that need one verification product
  • Buyers that need published pricing
  • Teams with no risk staff to handle policies

Rating by criterion

How the eight criteria that form the rating for Alloy are each scored out of 100.

Sector criteria

Verification coverage86

According to Alloy, sanctions screening runs against 1,000+ watchlists via data partners, and one integration covers 270+ third-party data solutions across 195 markets.

Fraud and risk signals84

Combines partner behavioral, device and document signals with Fraud Attack Radar and a Fraud Signal score of its own, and in September 2026 it added consortium insights from Nasdaq Verafin.

Case management and workflow90

Backtesting, a visual policy editor, champion-challenger tests capped at five versions, shadow testing, case management for AML and an AI assistant that reviews cases.

Regulatory fit86

Covers perpetual KYC and KYB, KYC, KYB, sanctions screening, AML monitoring, and e-filing of SAR and CTR with FinCEN. SOC 2 Type 2 is listed, as is ISO 27001:2022.

Vendor criteria

Product depth and roadmap86

A wide risk platform. In early 2026 it added perpetual KYB for the UK and for Europe, and an agentic AI assistant.

Onboarding and support74

Dashboard, help center and public status page provide support, but support tiers and response times are not published.

Pricing transparency46

Plans and prices are not published, and buyers reach sales by requesting a demo.

Contract terms60

Terms in the contract are not public. Sales negotiates them.

Against its peers

How Alloy compares with other companies we rate in KYC, AML & identity.

Fact file

Data connections270+ third-party data solutions via a single integration Source
CustomersAccording to Alloy, over 900 fintechs and financial institutions Source
Compliance toolsSAR e-filing with FinCEN, sanctions screening, AML monitoring, KYC, KYB, and perpetual KYC and KYB Source
CertificationsISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2 Source
PricingUnpublished, and sales-led Source

Source pages

  1. Alloy homepage: https://www.alloy.com/ (As of September 23, 2026)
  2. Alloy orchestration and decisioning engine: https://www.alloy.com/orchestration-decisioning-engine (As of September 23, 2026)
  3. Alloy identity verification: https://www.alloy.com/identity-verification (As of September 23, 2026)
  4. Alloy compliance: https://www.alloy.com/compliance (As of September 23, 2026)
  5. Alloy transaction monitoring: https://www.alloy.com/aml-transaction-monitoring (As of September 23, 2026)
  6. Alloy security: https://www.alloy.com/security (As of September 23, 2026)
  7. Alloy trust center: https://trust.alloy.com/ (As of September 23, 2026)
  8. Alloy developer documentation: https://developer.alloy.com/public/docs/introduction (As of September 23, 2026)
  9. Alloy launches AI Assistant: https://www.alloy.com/about/press/alloy-launches-ai-assistant (As of September 23, 2026)
  10. Nasdaq Verafin and Alloy partnership: https://www.alloy.com/about/press/nasdaq-verafin-and-alloy-partner (As of September 23, 2026)
  11. Alloy AI info page: https://www.alloy.com/ai-info (As of September 23, 2026)
  12. Alloy on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alloy_(company) (As of September 23, 2026)

How this rating was made

This profile gives our own assessment of Alloy to companies selecting a KYC, AML & identity provider. The Fintech Index receives nothing for featuring a firm, for sponsorship, or for advertising, and Alloy gave us no payment for the profile.

The rating equals the average of eight criteria, with every criterion running from 0 to 100. Four address buyer needs in this sector, and four address the company together with its commercial terms.

Ratings are our editorial judgment, made from public information: pricing and legal pages, product documentation, compliance disclosures, and filings. This profile had no lab tests, and no accounts were opened. Fact-checking took place on September 23, 2026.