SEON vs Sardine: Features, Coverage and Pricing Compared (2026)
Updated November 12, 2026 · Reviewed by Benjamin Margolis
SEON and Sardine both score sign-ups, logins, and payments for fraud and add AML screening and transaction monitoring. SEON posts a Starter plan at $699 a month and leans on email, phone, and device footprint data. Sardine quotes every product and leans on device and behavior signals across a large enterprise base.
Our analysts compared the two on November 12, 2026, using each company's own product, pricing, and company pages and our full reviews of SEON and Sardine.
Choose SEON if
- you want a posted entry price
- you want email and phone footprint checks
- you run a marketplace or iGaming site
Choose Sardine if
- you want device and behavior biometrics at enterprise scale
- you want KYB with fraud and AML
- you are a large fintech or platform
SEON scores 81 and Sardine scores 77 in our ratings. SEON is easier to start with a posted plan. Sardine suits larger fintechs that want behavior signals and a bundled enterprise contract.
Key Features Compared
SEON vs Sardine at a Glance, November 2026
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Fintech Index score | 81 / 100Higher score | 77 / 100 |
| Overview | ||
| What it is | Budapest and Austin fraud prevention and AML platform that scores sign-ups, logins, and payments with digital footprint and device data for fintechs, marketplaces, and iGaming operators | San Francisco fraud and compliance platform that uses device, behavior, and payment data to stop fraud and money laundering for banks and fintechs |
| Who uses it | More than 5,000 businesses, including fintechs, payment companies, marketplaces, and iGaming operators | More than 450 enterprises, including FIS, Deel, GoDaddy, and X |
| Main products | Digital footprint and device fraud scoring, identity verification, AML screening, and transaction monitoring | Device and behavior signals, KYC and KYB, payment fraud checks, transaction monitoring, and AI agents for alerts |
| Where it operates | Global, with offices in Austin, London, Budapest, Jakarta, and Singapore | Global |
| Products and features | ||
| Transaction monitoring | Included on Premium | Included |
| Device and behavior signals | Core strength | Core strength |
| Pricing | ||
| How pricing works | Starter $699 a month for 2,500 fraud checks, 10 users, and 50 rules; Premium priced on request | Quoted by product; fraud and AML modules can be bundled |
| Published prices | Starter price postedStarter price posted | Quote only |
| Technology and compliance | ||
| Certifications and compliance | Fraud and AML controls for regulated firms | Fraud and AML controls for regulated firms |
| Developer tools | API, integration guide, and MCP server for AI tools | APIs and SDKs for device and behavior data |
| Integrations and partners | Shopify, AWS, and API connections to onboarding and payment flows | Payment and account activity data |
| Onboarding and support | Support tickets and email on Starter; managed risk services available | Starts with a demo; setup covers rules and integrations for each product bought |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, and Budapest, Hungary | San Francisco, California |
| Ownership | Private fraud prevention and AML software | Private company |
| Funding | Approximately $187M, including an $80M Series C led by Sixth Street Growth in September 2025 with IVP, Creandum, Firebolt, and Hearst | ~$145M raised, including a $70M Series C in February 2025 led by Activant Capital, with Andreessen Horowitz, Nyca Partners, GV, Experian Ventures, and Moody’s among its investors |
| Key leader | Tamás Kádár | Soups Ranjan |
| Scale | More than 15 million transactions secured a day; approximately $187M raised | $1.8T of payments screened; 6.5 billion devices profiled |
Fintech Index Scores Compared
We rate every company on eight criteria from 0 to 100, four tied to what buyers in its sector need and four shared by every company, and the rating is their average. SEON scores 81 and Sardine scores 77.
Criterion Scores Out of 100
Key Differences Between SEON and Sardine
Pricing
SEON posts a Starter plan at $699 a month for 2,500 fraud checks, 10 users, and 50 custom rules, and prices Premium on request. Sardine quotes each product and bundles fraud and AML modules.
Signals
SEON checks more than 1,100 first-party signals tied to an email address, phone number, IP address, and device. Sardine is known for device and behavior data, with 6.5 billion devices profiled.
Scale
SEON serves more than 5,000 businesses and has raised approximately $187M. Sardine serves more than 450 enterprises and has screened $1.8 trillion of payments.
Pros and Cons
SEON
Pros
- Posted entry price
- Email, phone, and device footprint signals
- Fraud, identity, and AML on one platform
Cons
- Case management and AML need the custom plan
- Starter caps checks at 2,500 a month
- Less suited to large-bank correspondent monitoring
Sardine
Pros
- Strong device and behavior data
- Fraud, AML, and identity from one vendor
- Fast growth, with ARR up 130%
Cons
- No posted prices
- More than a team needs for simple document checks
- Younger vendor
Who Each Is Best For
SEON
A fintech, payments company, marketplace, or iGaming operator that wants fraud scoring, AML screening, and transaction monitoring from one vendor with a posted entry price.
Sardine
A bank, fintech, or marketplace that wants fraud prevention, AML monitoring, and identity checks from one vendor with deep device data.
Alternatives to SEON and Sardine
These companies, all reviewed and rated on The Fintech Index, cover some of the same ground as SEON and Sardine.
Other Fraud and AML Platforms
| Company | Score | Best for | Comparisons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oscilar | 71 | Risk teams that want fraud and credit decisions in one layer | None yet |
| Feedzai | 77 | Large banks and processors that want fraud and AML on one machine learning platform | None yet |
| Featurespace | 75 | Large banks and processors fighting payment fraud and scams | None yet |
| Unit21 | 76 | Risk teams that write their own fraud and AML rules | Unit21 vs Sardine |
| Alloy | 77 | Banks and fintechs that orchestrate many identity and fraud vendors | None yet |
| Flagright | 72 | Fintechs that need real-time transaction monitoring without an enterprise suite | None yet |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does SEON cost?
SEON's Starter plan is $699 a month for 2,500 fraud checks; Premium, with case management and AML, is priced on request.
Does Sardine publish prices?
No. Sardine quotes each product.
Do both cover AML?
Yes. Both add sanctions screening and transaction monitoring to fraud scoring.
Sources
- The Fintech Index analysis of SEON and Sardine, conducted November 2026 (As of November 12, 2026)
- SEON pricing: https://seon.io/pricing/ (As of November 12, 2026)
- SEON about page: https://seon.io/about-us/ (As of November 12, 2026)
- SEON Series C announcement, September 2025: https://seon.io/resources/news/series-c/ (As of November 12, 2026)
- SEON, Forbes 30 Under 30 founders: https://seon.io/resources/news/forbes-30-under-30-seons-founders-fighting-to-make-it-a-fincrime-free-world/ (As of November 12, 2026)
- Sardine home page: https://www.sardine.ai/ (As of November 12, 2026)
- Sardine, about: https://www.sardine.ai/about (As of November 12, 2026)
- Sardine, Series C announcement: https://www.sardine.ai/press/pr/fraud-and-compliance-productivity (As of November 12, 2026)
- Crunchbase News: https://news.crunchbase.com/cybersecurity/fraud-detection-startup-sardine-ai-fundraise/ (As of November 12, 2026)